casey wrote:

yes didnt jamie get something like 27 goals last season?and he hit bar at carshalton,great effort.he is only about 5 foot so hitting high balls wont work.im not knocking him,he does need help.whats our set up?kinder 433?

We're going to have to start calling you ' lower casey '
 

casey wrote:

yes didnt jamie get something like 27 goals last season?and he hit bar at carshalton,great effort.he is only about 5 foot so hitting high balls wont work.im not knocking him,he does need help.whats our set up?kinder 433?

Jamie is, actually, very good in the air.  He has got his head on more balls in his few matches than Dan Summers did in a whol season.  Jason Henry is also good in the air despite his lack of inches. 
 

Wow that really is an exciting prospect.
But we would have to dramatically change the way we are playing.

No more patient play across the back and down the flanks and then chip the ball long.
All balls slid through on the ground to players running on and through.
Who can play those balls?

I think it is unfair to simply suggest we played a negative 5 at the back.
We looked to control the ball across the back, draw their players forward and then push the 'wing backs' far forward.  Big difference

Last edited by Bondy (09/9/2015 8:41 pm)

maarlon wrote:

NO NO NO

 

Which is exactly what I was thinking.  I know there's lots of positives with the style of play and other issues that can be tinkered with - but I just fear how long it would be until we were all let down again.  Sorry to sound negative Plumpton but I don't want to see the upset repeated.  As mentioned earlier he has young family etc so if a better offer comes along I can see the same happening as last time.

I would never hold the family thing against anyone and would love to be proved wrong, but I am deffo apprehensive about it.

Last edited by Plumpton (09/9/2015 10:30 pm)